<- all tokdocs
2026.10.07@jaredroarss

The animated Gmail avatar is a real trick, but Google documents profile photos as JPEG or PNG only, and the branded inbox icons the video shows are BIMI logos, which the spec forbids from animating

Marketing
Watch on TikTok

View on TikTok ->

The artifact is a 73.928571 s MP4 in a mov,mp4,m4a,3gp,3g2,mj2 container at 1080x1920, HEVC Main profile (hvc1) at 56/1 fps across 4,140 frames at 515,253 bps, with HE-AACv2 audio at 44.1 kHz stereo and 48,128 bps, for an overall 572,664 bps and 5,292,031 bytes on disk; ffprobe contradicts the duration field in metadata.json, which rounds to 73, and metadata.json reports no fps or vbr at all, only tbr 572 and the format id bytevc1_1080p_572660-1. The post timestamp is epoch 1791396423, which is 2026-10-07T18:07:03 UTC. The uploader is @jaredroarss, uploader_id 6766636185248957446, nickname "Jaredroars"; the audio credit is "original sound" by Jaredroars, meaning no licensed track. The description runs 100 characters: "Would this increase your email open rate? #gmail #google #marketing #reactionvideo @Build in Public ". At capture time, the file mtime of metadata.json on 2026-10-19 at 00:56 local, the counts stood at 310,000 views, 14,400 likes, 108 comments and 3,010 reposts. I read 12 frames across the clip: 001, 004, 006, 008, 010, 012, 013, 014, 015, 018, 024 and 037, which at the 2 s extraction interval land near 0, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 24, 26, 28, 34, 46 and 72 seconds. The transcript holds 32 segments and 259 words. Every frame is a stacked split screen: the top half is a man in a cream cap, wire-rim glasses, black tee and over-ear headphones at a wooden desk with a boom mic and a mint mechanical keyboard, a floor lamp and an armchair behind him; the bottom half plays the video he is reacting to. Frame 001 shows the inner creator's face with the caption "Just a reminder that". Frame 004 shows a Gemini screen reading "Hi Edward" above "Where should we start?", with "Ask Gemini", "Drop files here", and a Tools menu listing "Create image", "Canvas", "Deep research" and "Create video", plus chips for "Write anything" and "Boost my day"; the caption underneath begins "Drag your business". Frames 006 and 008 show the Airbnb bélo mark on a red background and then on a magenta background, captioned "You want to get" and "there's not a ton of". Frame 010 shows a Google search results page with "CloudConvert", "https://cloudconvert.com", the purple visited link "MP4 to GIF Converter", and an "Ezgif" result below, captioned "Search mp4 to". Frame 012 shows a browser address bar reading "myaccount.google.com" with a bookmarks bar of "Fast", "25min", "Drive" and the Gmail icon. Frame 013 shows a Google Account page with the name "Edward Sturm" under a circular avatar with the camera-icon overlay and a cursor on it. Frame 014 shows a macOS Finder list with a selected file "f_b_e_q_c_mp_.gif" above "LP Testimonial -...pact Keywords.mp4", "channels4_profile.jpg" carrying an Airbnb favicon, a folder "4.13.25-2.21.202...March-April 2024" and "Extra Light.png", captioned "Now all you have". Frames 015 and 018 show a dark mobile mail list headed "All Inboxes" with sender bodies blurred, star toggles on the right, and avatar circles reading purple "G", orange "E", the Airbnb mark on magenta, "stripe" on indigo and a red "A", captioned "This increases open" and "No one else is going". Frames 024 and 037 return to the inner creator's face with the caption "This is the easiest", and in 037 the reactor has his hand on a mouse. The spoken argument is that Gmail's reach makes the sender avatar valuable real estate, that you can animate your logo in Gemini, convert the clip to a GIF and upload it as your Google Account profile photo, and that this raises open rates because nobody else has a moving icon; the reactor then says he likes the idea, calls it data backed, and asks whether it would survive being sent through a CRM. The last transcript segment runs 72.88 s to 73.60 s against a video duration of 73.928571 s and an audio.mp3 duration of 73.952653 s, so no segment is timestamped past the end of the audio and I found no Whisper hallucination in this file.

The "22% of the global population" figure measures accounts, and no Google-published count was reachable

The clip opens at 0.00 s with "Just a reminder that 22% of the global population uses Gmail and this is the easiest marketing hack that anybody can do." The arithmetic is checkable. The United Nations World Population Prospects 2024, released on 11 July 2024, puts world population at 8.2 billion in 2024. Twenty-two percent of 8.2 billion is about 1.80 billion, which lines up with the 1.8 billion estimate that circulated in press coverage of Gmail's twentieth anniversary in April 2024.

Two problems sit under that number. The first is that 1.8 billion is a press estimate rather than a disclosure. I tried to reach a Google-published Gmail user count and could not: the blog.google post that outlets cite for a higher figure did not resolve for me, and the BleepingComputer piece I did fetch, dated 2 September 2025, uses "2.5 billion Gmail users worldwide" only while describing a false claim it is debunking, not as a count Google published. I am not citing a Gmail user count to any Google source because I could not verify one.

The second problem is the unit. Every count in circulation measures Google accounts, not individual humans. A freelancer with a personal address, a business address and a throwaway signup address is three accounts and one person. "Of the global population uses Gmail" is a claim about people, and the available counts do not measure people. The figure also does nothing to support the hack that follows it: Gmail's size tells you how many inboxes have an avatar slot, not whether putting motion in that slot changes behavior.

"75% of the US market uses Gmail" is a self-report survey number, and Litmus put Gmail at 16.10% of September 2026 opens

At 38.90 s the video says "75% of the US market uses Gmail." I could not reach a primary source for it. Secondary aggregators trace the number to Statista's U.S. Consumer Insights survey, which asks respondents which email services they use, and Statista's underlying data sits behind a paywall I did not get through. I am labeling the figure Unverified rather than citing an aggregator's restatement of it.

What I could verify is a different measure of the same market. Litmus publishes an email client market share page calculated, in its own words, "from over 1.5 billion opens in Litmus Email Analytics, in September 2026." That September 2026 reading puts Apple at 76.56% of opens, Gmail at 16.10% and Outlook at 3.48%. The two numbers are not in contradiction so much as they measure different things: a survey counts people who have a Gmail address, and Litmus counts tracked opens by rendering client. A person can hold a Gmail account and read almost all their mail in Apple Mail on an iPhone, which is exactly what the gap between 75% self-reported usage and 16.10% of opens describes.

That distinction matters for this specific hack, because the hack is a rendering trick. It only fires in a client that pulls and animates the Google avatar. A recipient whose Gmail address is fetched into Apple Mail does not see the Gmail interface at all, and the Litmus September 2026 split says that is where most tracked opens now land.

The open-rate claim carries no number, and Mail Privacy Protection makes open rate the wrong metric to test it with

At 27.52 s the video says "This increases open rates a ton because nobody else uses moving email icons." The reactor catches this at 44.26 s with "Data driven" and again at 65.26 s with "I would have liked to have known the exact open rates that he had before versus after." He is right to want the number, and the number does not exist in the source material. The Google Account screen at frame 013 names the inner creator as Edward Sturm. His own article, "5-Minute Gmail Hacks That Will Triple Your Open Rates," dated 8 February 2026, lists the results of the animated avatar as "Increased open rates," "Increased top-of-mind awareness" and "Increased conversions" without attaching a figure, a sample size or a before-and-after to any of them. The headline promises a tripling and the body delivers no measurement. The claim is Unverified.

Even with a figure, open rate would be a poor instrument here. Apple announced Mail Privacy Protection on 7 June 2021, stating in its own release that "In the Mail app, Mail Privacy Protection stops senders from using invisible pixels to collect information about the user." Because protected clients prefetch remote content, the tracking pixel fires whether or not a human looked at the message. Litmus states on its market share page that "Studies show that Apple's MPP now impact roughly 55-60% of all email opens" and that "Privacy-impacted opens are included in Apple Mail opens." Mailchimp's own benchmarks page, whose data it says "was last updated in December 2023" and which reports a 35.63% average open rate across all industries from campaigns sent to at least 1,000 subscribers, carries the warning that "The accuracy of email open rates may be impacted by Apple's privacy changes and their Mail Privacy Protection (MPP) feature, and this should be considered as you interpret open rate data." If more than half of opens are machine-generated prefetches, a before-and-after open rate cannot isolate the effect of an avatar.

Sturm's article does concede the ceiling: "Gmail desktop doesn't put icons as dominant as in mobile - which matters because 80% of emails are opened on a mobile device." That 80% mobile figure is itself unsourced in his piece, and I am not carrying it forward as verified.

Google documents the profile photo as JPEG or PNG only, so the GIF runs on undocumented behavior

The workflow at 21.58 s is "Go to myaccount.google.com, click the camera icon," followed at 25.30 s by "Now all you have to do is upload the GIF you made." Frames 012 and 013 show exactly that path, the address bar on myaccount.google.com and the camera overlay on the Edward Sturm avatar.

Google's own documentation does not describe GIF as a supported input. The Google Workspace admin page on adding or changing a user's profile photo states that "The file format is JPEG or PNG only," that "The maximum file size is 5 MB," and that "The maximum pixel count is 20 million." Animation is not mentioned anywhere in those requirements. The consumer-facing Google Contacts help page on changing your Google Account picture, which is the path the video actually uses, lists no format requirements at all: it says only to "Upload a photo from your computer or choose one of your Google Photos," and gives cropping steps with no technical specification for the file.

So the honest description is this. Third-party write-ups, including a Dyspatch post dated 18 January 2025, report that the consumer upload accepts an animated GIF and that "Once you've uploaded the GIF, it will take a few minutes to propagate on your account." That post gives no account of where the animation renders, whether recipients in other clients see motion or a still frame, or whether Workspace accounts behave like consumer accounts, and it carries no caveats about client compatibility. The video presents the trick as a Gmail feature. It is better described as a behavior of one upload path that Google has never documented and has never committed to keeping, sitting directly against a published JPEG-or-PNG-only requirement on the administrative path for the same field.

The Gemini step is better supported. Frame 004 shows the Gemini composer with a "Create video" entry in the Tools menu. Google announced photo-to-video in the Gemini app on 10 July 2025, powered by Veo 3, producing "dynamic eight-second video clips with sound" for "Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers in select countries around the world." Two details the video skips: the output is capped at eight seconds, which is why a GIF conversion is viable at all, and Google states the clips carry both visible and invisible watermarks marking them as AI generated.

The Airbnb and Stripe icons in the inbox shot are BIMI logos, and Google's BIMI requirements forbid animation

This is the sharpest correction. At 27.52 s and again at 32.64 s the video says "nobody else uses moving email icons" and "No one else is using email icons that move," and the frames chosen to illustrate that point are frames 015 and 018, a mail list where the recognizable icons are the Airbnb bélo on magenta and a "stripe" wordmark on indigo. Those are not Google Account profile photos. They are BIMI logos, and they occupy a slot that cannot animate by design.

Google announced general availability of BIMI across Gmail on 12 July 2021, writing that "For senders that have adopted DMARC and have validated their imagery, Gmail will display the validated logos in the avatar slots, increasing confidence in the source of emails." On 3 May 2023 Google extended it, adding that "users will now see a checkmark icon for senders that have adopted BIMI. This will help users identify messages from legitimate senders versus impersonators," on condition that an organization has "adopted DMARC" and "validated your logo with a VMC, issued by a Certification Authority such as Entrust or DigiCert."

Google's Workspace help page on setting up BIMI spells out the constraints. The DMARC "policy option (p) must be set to quarantine or reject" and "The percent option (pct) must be set to 100." "Logos used with BIMI must be in Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) file format." "The image size must be a minimum height and width of 96 pixels." A Verified Mark Certificate or a Common Mark Certificate is required. And on the question at issue, the page states that SVG files "should not include...Animations or other interactive elements." The BIMI Group, publisher of the specification through the AuthIndicators Working Group, lists among unsupported elements "Filters and effects, Embedded images, Scripting and animations (<script>, <animate>, <animateTransform>, etc.)" in a page dated 19 June 2024. The restriction is a security decision, not an oversight: an animated logo in a trusted identity slot could imitate interface chrome.

So the claim that nobody uses moving email icons is correct for brand senders, and it is correct because the standard that puts brand icons there prohibits motion. A company that has gone through DMARC enforcement and bought a VMC cannot adopt this hack without abandoning the verified logo it paid for. The hack is available to individual senders using a personal Google profile photo, which is a narrower audience than an inbox screenshot full of Airbnb and Stripe implies.

The reaction's CRM question is the right one, and the answer is that the avatar follows the sending identity

At 53.66 s the reactor says "It had to be from your Gmail to somebody else's Gmail," and at 55.88 s "Because if I sent that through a CRM, I wonder if that would still push the same logo." His instinct is correct and the mechanism explains why.

The avatar Gmail renders is resolved from the sending identity, not from the message body. For an individual sender with a Google account, that resolution can reach the Google Account profile photo. For a message sent from a marketing platform on a company domain, the identity is the company domain, and the avatar path for a company domain is BIMI, which requires the DMARC enforcement, SVG Tiny PS logo and VMC or CMC described above. Nothing about an individual's profile photo travels with a campaign sent from a CRM on a different authenticated domain.

That narrows the tactic considerably. It is useful for one-to-one and small-batch sending from a personal or Workspace address where the recipient's client renders the Google avatar. It does not apply to broadcast campaigns, which is where "open rate" is normally measured in the first place. The reactor identified the limitation in a single sentence and the source video never addresses it.

Key Takeaways

  • Partial correction: The video says at 0.00 s that "22% of the global population uses Gmail." The arithmetic implies about 1.8 billion against the UN's 8.2 billion world population for 2024, but every available count measures Google accounts rather than people, and I could not reach any Google-published Gmail user count to cite.
  • Unverified: "75% of the US market uses Gmail" at 38.90 s. Secondary aggregators trace it to a Statista Consumer Insights self-report survey I could not reach. Litmus, counting rendering clients, put Gmail at 16.10% of opens in September 2026 against Apple at 76.56%, from over 1.5 billion opens.
  • Unverified: "This increases open rates a ton" at 27.52 s. Edward Sturm's own article of 8 February 2026 lists "Increased open rates" with no figure, no sample and no before-and-after, under a headline promising a tripling.
  • Context: Apple's Mail Privacy Protection, announced 7 June 2021, prefetches remote content so the tracking pixel fires without a human read. Litmus states MPP now affects roughly 55 to 60 percent of all opens, and Mailchimp attaches an MPP accuracy warning to its own 35.63% all-industry average from December 2023 data. An open-rate before-and-after cannot isolate an avatar change under those conditions.
  • Correction: The video presents the animated GIF upload as a Gmail feature. Google's Workspace documentation for the profile photo field states "The file format is JPEG or PNG only," with a 5 MB and 20-million-pixel ceiling, and never mentions animation. The consumer upload path the video uses publishes no format requirements at all. The trick works per third-party reports, including a Dyspatch post of 18 January 2025, but it is undocumented behavior rather than a supported capability.
  • Correction: "Nobody else uses moving email icons" at 27.52 s is illustrated with Airbnb and Stripe avatars in frames 015 and 018. Those are BIMI logos, not profile photos. Google's BIMI setup page requires SVG, DMARC at quarantine or reject with pct=100, a minimum 96 by 96 pixel image and a VMC or CMC, and states SVG files "should not include...Animations or other interactive elements." The BIMI Group lists <animate> and <animateTransform> among forbidden elements. Brand icons do not move because the standard forbids it.
  • Clarification: The demonstration animates the Airbnb mark, visible on a red background in frame 006 and magenta in frame 008, with the matching "channels4_profile.jpg" in frame 014. A Verified Mark Certificate exists to certify that an avatar logo belongs to its trademark holder. Uploading another company's mark to a personal Google profile is the impersonation case BIMI closes.
  • Verified: The Gemini step is real. Google announced photo-to-video in the Gemini app on 10 July 2025, powered by Veo 3, producing eight-second clips with sound for Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. The eight-second cap is what makes GIF conversion practical. Google states the output carries visible and invisible watermarks, which the video does not mention.
  • Verified: The reactor's CRM question at 55.88 s identifies the real limit. The Gmail avatar resolves from the sending identity, so a personal Google profile photo does not travel with a campaign sent from a CRM on a company domain. That domain's avatar path is BIMI, which is static.
  • Context: Sturm's article concedes the ceiling himself, writing that "Gmail desktop doesn't put icons as dominant as in mobile." His supporting figure that 80% of emails are opened on mobile is unsourced in that article and I am not treating it as verified.

Resources

Published October 7, 2026. Writeup generated from a favorited TikTok.